前兩天剛說Spotify是音樂人救星,這不就來個佐證?
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2018/08/07/citigroup-music-industry-sales/Warner Music Group (WMG) CEO Steve Cooper revealed that digital revenue – fueled mostly by growing streaming music – now represents 60.1% of WMG’s total revenue. In its Q1 / calendar Q2 2018 report, Sony Music revealed that digital revenue – again, powered mostly by streaming – makes up 63% of its total revenue. Finally, Vivendi, Universal Music Group’s (UMG) parent company, revealed the label generated $1.44 billion in streaming revenue for the first half of 2018.營業額因為線上音樂而大成長啊!
The Big 3 – Sony Music, WMG, and UMG – now earn billions each year from the explosive rise in streaming music services.
那,創作者分多少?12%,嫌少?看這張分配圖,
平台"成本"佔最高,這可不假,要撐那麼大容量,單是硬碟要多少個,你想想?
唱片公司的的成本與利潤次之,再來是平台的利潤...
這不合理嗎?你可以想想,要營運個平台或唱片公司要多少人?
一曲擺到平台上去讓人線上聽,需要多少人花多少時間去處理?沒那麼簡單哪...
反問,一款音響上市賣,設計者能拿到多少?12%?哪有哪麼好~
經銷商就要拿40%囉~賺太多?且慢,試問你這位消費者,這音響你是自己去店頭買,自己帶回家搞定,之後都不會要求店家免費的服務,無論是親身跑一趟或電話口頭諮詢?
在台灣啊,service真的是殺必死,一毛都拿不到哪...
沒有留言:
張貼留言