這會來了個老兄,用的機器就高檔多了
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/150343-computer-based-hifi-13.html#post1973789
DAC還用了Chord QDB76!這隻可不便宜啊...
而且號稱用上buffer及精準的clock能將jitter壓在3ps之內!AudioPrecision的儀器也不過到4ps而已勒~
那,真的能消除jitter嗎?
這老兄試著用光纖輸入,因為設計者建議用光纖,能避開前面來的電氣雜訊,
沒想到...聲音比同軸電纜差...
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/150343-computer-based-hifi-13.html#post1974778
這...用了buffer隔開前面的jitter,再用精準的clock送出,照說用光纖不至於會比用同軸電纜差啊?
難道光纖的資料會錯?
還是Chord唬爛?
許多測試顯示Toslink會導致較高的jitter...是這原因造成的?
當然,我不知道發文者所說的比較差是怎麼回事,也只能相信他的耳力了...
其中他提到的這一篇的後續
http://www.zerogain.com/forum/showpost.php?p=15714&postcount=21
發文者嘗試比較光纖與同軸電纜,結果也說光纖比較差,差在哪?
Hmmm....somethings wrong, everything sounds terribly "thin". No body, no warmth, very clinical. Also, when the music moves into the treble registers it's very bright - harsh even. Someone please pick my ears back up off the carpet
Next up, my Apogee Wyde-Eye cable which I terminated with RCA Bullet plugs, also straight into the DAC64:
Ahhh...that's much better, all the body and soul of the music has returned
這...或許會有些值得玩味之處...
音響的表現,必須看整體,某個環節偏左,若是補上個偏右的環節,那就拉回來了。
不知這位仁兄的狀況是否是如此?
何以我如此推論?
因為這句
Just a touch less detail though, things ever so slightly less well defined as with the TOSlink
較多的細節,代表者較正確的訊息(當然,這是指整體全頻段的細節,而不是只有高頻);
而這位仁兄說比較差的部份,其實是指整體平衡,這該是後面機器的問題...
精準乾淨,就會讓人覺得比較多高音與較少的低頻,這位仁兄的系統該是偏一邊了...
許多人習慣於一堆低頻,卻沒想過“如臨現場”這詞的意義...
再請DIY audio上這位解釋差異何在
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/150343-computer-based-hifi-13.html#post1975644
只差一點點...
I would say lack of depth in the mid to upper frequencies was noticeable. I listened to bit of KD Lang's Ingenue album, and the depth and articulation of her voice seemed to suffer a little. Not a huge amount, but enough for me to be sure there was a difference...
倘若是Toslink jitter先天就比同軸電纜差很多(在他提到的另一篇裡),應該有相當明顯的差異才對,而不是這麼一點點...
沒有留言:
張貼留言